• Honors1

    The Honors Fellowship

    All students who were approved to conduct departmental Honors in the 2011-12 academic year were eligible to apply for fellowships through the new William and Mary Honors Fellowship program. Representing a variety of disciplines, the Fellows receive funding to devote 10 full-time weeks during the summer for research and additional money during the year for project-related expenses.

  • honors3

    The Dintersmiths

    A faculty committee reviews all Honors Fellowship applications and awards five fellowships funded by Ted Dintersmith, an alumnus who completed honors theses in both Physics and English when he was an undergraduate.

  • script

    The Blog

    All Honors Fellows will submit posts to the W&M Honors Fellows blog for a full year as they research and write their honors theses. Follow along as these students experience the highs and lows of creating, conducting, and completing an individual research project.

  • bethlehamPA

    The Thesis

    The Departmental Honors Program provides qualified students the opportunity to complete a two-semester, six-credit research project under the supervision of a faculty advisor.  Each Honors project culminates in a thesis and oral defense.   Completing an Honors project can be one of the most academically rewarding experiences of a student’s undergraduate career.

Feb
23

More Data, Please!

Well, for such a short month, a lot’s been going on!  I gave a presentation for the Honors Colloquium last week, wrote the paper I’m giving at the Middle Atlantic Archaeological Conference next month, and made a poster for the Science Symposium happening later this week.  So I’m getting lots of practice presenting my findings!  Which is good, I guess – just a little stressful all at once.

I’ve also been working a lot with my data.  I’ve found that the variability in the elemental concentrations increases drastically between the Middle Woodland I and Middle Woodland II periods, possibly indicating an increase in exchange – but unfortunately, the number of Middle Woodland sherds I’ve tested is tiny in comparison to the numbers from later phases, so it’s hard to say how legitimate that trend is.  There’s also an issue with shell temper, which is not preserved in the Chickahominy sherds, but is in the Kiskiak ones and seems to be driving concentrations down.  Basically, as I’m slogging through all of the data and trying to find patterns, I’m seeing how much more I want to have.  I want to test more sherds, from other test units, other sites, and older phases.  I want to calibrate the spectrometer to pick up more elements than just the 13 it’s set up for now.  I want to be able to compare the Kiskiak sherds to others in a similar state of preservation.  I want to collect more clay samples.  I do think that the XRF method is working and can be usefully employed to address archaeological questions in the Chesapeake area – I’m just not sure that I can address them with what I have now.  And that’s frustrating.  But on the bright side, I know where I can go from here!

Feb
12

A Semester In Review

I apologize for not writing a post last semester but to say Fall Semester flew by would be an understatement. It took a while to get accustomed to my new positions and responsibilities on campus so I unfortunately couldn’t focus as much of my energy on my thesis as I would have wanted. I am the President of Circle K International (CKI) and have 16 board members and over 60 club members to organize, coordinate, and keep happy. I set out some lofty goals and am proud to say that we achieved a majority of them. In addition to that new position, I am also one of two Student Directors of Branch Out Regional Alternative Break Program on campus. Katie, my co-director, and I had to organize training for our site leaders, lead a retreat, and advice weekend service trips throughout the semester. We now have a hold on how to best execute plans and thereby foresee only smooth sailing from now on. Now that I have a handle on my extracurricular, I have my eyes set on completing a well-researched honors thesis.

All that being said, it doesn’t mean last semester was unproductive. I attended the 44th Annual International Society for Developmental Psychobiology (ISDP) Conference in DC. Mark Hayden, a fellow senior, and I presented two posters at the conference, one being the founding research on which my thesis builds off of. You can find the abstract and others here: http://isdpcentraloffice.org/abstractlist.asp but I’ll also include them at the bottom of this post. I extremely enjoyed the conference- being able listen to speakers from around the globe talk about interesting new research in the field was thrilling! Also, being reunited with my adviser, Pam Hunt, who spent the semester in Canada for her sabbatical was another bonus. We had the opportunity to discuss my thesis and get a handle on the progress.

In terms of my actually research- I completed phase three. Phase three is an evaluation of how much the rats learned and what the effects mercury and Vitamin E had on their abilities to learn. For this phase, I watched videotapes of my rats and assess if they were freezing or not. Freezing is the complete absence of movement and a behavior that rats exhibit if they are experiencing fear. Since they should have learned to associate the light with a shock, when exposed to only the light they should have been scared and hence frozen. So, more freezing equates to more learning. After all the videos were watched and scored (by both Pam and myself), they need to be statistically analyzed. Since I didn’t take pysc stats (I took statistics in the math department) I was unfamiliar with SPSS- a computer statistics program. Pam helped me by running the program and we just got out results last week. I’ll save the results and implications for another post since I have some major literary research to do to explain why our results came out the way they did. I won’t spoil anything- so you’ll just have to wait.

Now, I am just preparing for the Honors Colloquium. I am presenting on Wednesday February 15th at 12pm in Blow 201. Come out and hear about the results if you don’t want to wait for another post.

Otherwise, take care until next time.

 

Here are the abstracts:

Abstract Title: NEONATAL MERCURY IMPAIRS CONTEXT FEAR CONDITIONING IN RATS
Abstract:
NEONATAL MERCURY IMPAIRS CONTEXT FEAR CONDITIONING IN RATS. K. Kapetanovic & P.S. Hunt, Department of Psychology, College of William & Mary, Williamsburg, VA 23187. kkapetanovic@email.wm.edu. Hayden et al. (ISDP, 2011) report that neonatal mercury exposure has a profound effect on hippocampal function in rats, as assessed with a trace fear conditioning procedure. To further examine mercurys toxic effects on hippocampal function the present experiment utilized the context pre-exposure facilitation effect (CPFE), a procedure that is highly sensitive to hippocampal damage. If animals are shocked immediately upon placement in the context, there is little evidence of learning relative to a standard conditioning control in which animals are allowed to explore the context for several minutes prior to shock delivery. This immediate shock deficit can be overcome by pre-exposure to the context 24 h prior to training. In the present experiment mercury (0 or 1 mg/kg) was injected once per day on postnatal days (PD) 4-9, and subjects were trained on PD 23-25. Subjects were pre-exposed to the Same context as training, to a Different context or given No pre-exposure. On PD 24 animals were given a single shock immediately upon placement in the training context. Other animals were trained using standard context conditioning procedures. On PD25 animals were tested for freezing to the training context. Results indicate that mercury-exposed animals failed to show the CPFE whereas control subjects did. However, mercury-exposed animals showed learning that was equivalent to that of controls following standard context conditioning. These results, along with Hayden et al.s, indicate a particular sensitivity of the hippocampus to the toxic effects of neonatal mercury exposure. [Research supported by grant AA015343 to PSH]

Abstract Title: SENSORY PRECONDITIONING AND SECOND-ORDER CONDITIONING IN AN ANIMAL MODEL OF FETAL ALCOHOL SPECTRUM DISORDER
Abstract:
SENSORY PRECONDITIONING AND SECOND-ORDER CONDITIONING IN AN ANIMAL MODEL OF FETAL ALCOHOL SPECTRUM DISORDER. P.S. Hunt, R.C. Barnet, K. Kapetanovic, A. Pudasaini & E.A. Wingfield, Department of Psychology, College of William & Mary, Williamsburg, VA 23187. pshunt@wm.edu Recently, research with animal models of Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD) has shown that alcohol-exposed rats are impaired in higher-order learning processes (e.g. trace fear conditioning, contextual fear conditioning), but appear unaffected in simple Pavlovian delay fear conditioning. The present experiment studied two other higher-order learning tasks, sensory preconditioning (SPC) and second order conditioning (SOC), in a rat model of FASD. Rats were given 5.0 g/kg ethanol on postnatal days (PD) 4-9 or sham intubations. On PD 30 subjects began training. On one day, animals were given light-shock pairings (L+) and on the other day they were given simultaneous, serial, or unpaired presentations of a tone with the light (TL). The two procedures differed in the order of these training sessions. In SOC animals were first trained with L+ followed by TL. In SPC the TL phase preceded L+ training. All animals, regardless of ethanol exposure or training procedure, showed high levels of fear (freezing) to the first-order light CS. Also, ethanol had no effect on freezing to the second-order CS, the tone, in the SOC procedure. In contrast, ethanol-exposed animals were significantly impaired in learning about the higher-order tone in the SPC procedure. These results indicate an ethanol-induced impairment in sensory integration in the SPC procedure. These findings suggest that SPC is sensitive to the effects of neonatal ethanol exposure and also lend support to the hypothesis that different neural systems are involved in learning in these two procedures. [Research supported by NIAAA grant AA015343]

Abstract Title: NEONATAL MERCURY, HIPPOCAMPUS-DEPENDENT LEARNING AND ANXIETY IN A RAT MODEL
Abstract:
NEONATAL MERCURY, HIPPOCAMPUS-DEPENDENT LEARNING AND ANXIETY IN A RAT MODEL. M.A. Hayden,1 K. Kapetanovic,1 D.A. Cristol2 & P.S. Hunt1, 1Department of Psychology and 2Department of Biology, College of William & Mary, Williamsburg, VA 23187. mahayden@email.wm.edu. The toxic effects of mercury exposure during prenatal development have been known since the 1950s when high levels of environmental mercury contamination in Minamata, Japan were found to affect neurological function in the children. Since that time a number of case studies have been reported showing cognitive and behavioral effects of gestational mercury exposure. In animal models gestational exposure has produced many of the symptoms of Minamata Disease, although cognitive impairments have not been consistently reported. One possible reason for this is that most of these studies ceased mercury exposure at birth, thus missing the third trimester period that occurs after birth in rodents. Here, we modeled mercury exposure during the postnatal brain growth spurt by exposing neonatal rats to mercury (0, 1 or 2 mg/kg, i.p.) once per day on postnatal days [PD] 4-9. Subjects were trained on PD30 in either a delay or a trace fear conditioning procedure. Other animals were tested for exploration, general activity and anxiety-like behaviors in an open field and an elevated plus maze. Results indicated that trace fear conditioning was affected by mercury at a lower dose (1 mg/kg) than was delay fear conditioning. We also observed reduced anxiety in 2 mg/kg mercury-exposed animals, but no change in activity levels. These results suggest a greater sensitivity of the hippocampus to the toxic effects of mercury, although amygdala function also appears to be affected by higher doses. [Research supported by grant AA015343 (PSH) and a grant to the Department of Biology from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (DAC)]

 

Jan
29

What does it all mean???

Well, the method works!  I’ve been working on the analysis end of the project for the past several weeks, and that’s what I’ve concluded.  (Hey, this is a pilot study.)  Basically, looking at the data very simply (box plots and scatter plots), I can see that the sherds from the Kiskiak site and the sherds from the Chickahominy site fall into two separate groups – which is exactly what we hoped to see, considering that the sites are located on two different river drainages and the people building pots locally would have had access two different types of clays.  If I were given a single sherd to test with the XRF spectrometer, I would have a really good shot at telling you which site it came from.  So the XRF method can pick up differences in the clays and ceramics of the Chesapeake region, and therefore it has the potential to answer all sorts of interesting questions, like the ones regarding exchange patterns I proposed initially.

Looking at the differences between individual strata, things get more complicated.  Given a sherd, I would not be able to tell you which stratum in the ground it hailed from, using only XRF data.  This is not particularly surprising, however, given that people probably used similar clays through time.  Looking at the overall patterns, though, particularly in the changing number of outliers, may yield some interesting results.  I’ve found that the sherds which look physically different and stood out from the rest during the physical characterization phase actually turned out to be statistical outliers in most elements when analyzed with XRF.  So that’s pretty exciting, all in all!  I know that I have some good data to work with, if I can just make sense of everything.  Find the right patterns, the right statistical method, the right way of seeing things….

I also have to make sure that I don’t misrepresent or exaggerate patterns when I see them, just out of the desire to find something interesting!  At last, I understand how generally ethical scientists introduce bias into their work.  Right now, I’m working through that challenge and attempting to write up my results.  And then I’ll show them to some people who know what they’re doing, and hopefully they can tell me what the next steps should be and what else I should look at.  For now, time to get back to messing around with SPSS….  See you in a few weeks, when I next crawl out from under my rock!

Jan
26

The Home Stretch

Not too much to update since my last post. I’ve been doing a bit more secondary reading and am nearing the completion of the first draft of chapter 2. Hoping to have it ready for my adviser by next weekend.

It’s hard to believe I’ve started my final semester here and that in just a few weeks, this project will be completed! I’ve enjoyed every minute and am hoping to savor these last few months.

Jan
25

Joint Mathematics Meeting in Boston

I hope you all had a wonderful holiday season and a Happy New Year.

I spent most of my break from school planning and then participating in the Joint Mathematics Meetings in Boston. This is the biggest math conference in the United States and I was honored to be able to present a poster in the undergraduate poster session at JMM again.

My extended family lives in Boston so I arrived in Boston on the 23rd of December, although the conference did not actually start until January 4th. I was able to spend this time with my family over Christmas and New Year’s, but also preparing my spiel to give to anyone who was intrigued by my poster.

The poster session was held on Friday, so I was able to attend a variety of talks in the days beforehand, ranging from talks concerning graduate school to a talk given by a high-school friend of mine who I randomly ran into at the conference. I also was able to attend a graduate school fair and meet many representatives from universities that I am applying to. The time flew by though, and soon it was time to present at the poster session.

The session consists of two segments, each an hour long. In the first segment, the judges wander around asking questions and, for lack of a better word, judging the undergraduate’s posters. The second hour consists of the rest of the attendees of the conference coming around and just chatting about the posters and projects. It is only natural to be nervous in cases like this, but the organizers and the judges do a wonderful job at putting you at ease and allowing you to really explain what you know and what you are working on.

In action: describing the subtleties of my Blue Crab model to a mathematics student from Mary Washington

I presented at this same conference a year ago in New Orleans and had only three people visit my poster during a three-hour long session, so I was expecting much of the same this time. However, that was not the case at all. I had around 20 people come by to ask me about my research, including professors and graduate students from schools which I am applying to! It was a wonderful two hours and I was able to learn a lot from the questions that I was asked, as well as pass on information concerning the Blue Crab and our model to many intrigued viewers. It was a wonderful experience and it has motivated me to work even harder now that I am back at school.

Speaking of being back at school, I have now begun to knuckle down and really get to writing the draft of my Honors Thesis. I have previously given it a lot of thought, but not put much down in writing, preferring to focus on the mathematical aspects. As my last semester begins, however, time is running out. As such, I have started working on writing a solid introduction to the thesis, as well as a mathematical (and non-mathematical) explanation of the stability and numerical analysis that we have done.

I will be presenting my research in a talk at the Honors Colloquium in the coming weeks, as well as my poster at the Symposium, so I will be in and around my research a lot this semester. Thankfully, that keeps me from thinking about the fact that any day now I could hear from any of my 11 schools that I applied to!

Thanks for reading, and I’ll update again soon.

Jan
25

The Beginning of the End

Fellow seniors, we are now on the downhill slope of our last year at the college, and let me be the first to say, it’s freaking me out! By now, most people have been accepted to a school, found a job, or have turned in their tall stack of applications and are patiently (or not so patiently) waiting to hear from their dream school or job. I am one of those people playing the waiting game, semi-neurotically checking my email, and even making the trek to the mailboxes in the Sadler Center just to make sure I don’t miss any form of communication from my future schools (hopefully).

One of the ways I have been keeping myself busy is working on this Honor’s Project. Thankfully the long process of data collection is over, though I will miss the experience of putting the EEG cap on people, and their interesting and unpredictable reactions to that new experience, I am excited to move this project forward into the exciting data analysis stage where hopefully my seven months of hard work will pay off with exciting results! Whilst in the data analysis stage I also am beginning to gather information for the introduction on my thesis, so from this blog on I will include at least one mismatch negativity or autism fun fact.

The other way that I have been passing the waiting time is by Pinterest and looking up pictures of adorable animals. My current search includes Boo the puppy and teacup pigs (so cute :) )

FUN FACT #1: Mismatch Negativity can be used to study tourettes, dyslexia, aphasia, and alcoholism due to it’s ability to test unconscious attentional processes.

FUN FACT #2: There is talk of expanding the Autism diagnosis in the DSM V to include both Asperger’s and Pervasive Development Disorder not otherwise specified (PDD)

 

Jan
18

I think I’ll go to Boston…

Hello again! It’s been a few months since I last blogged. Final papers, exams and then all the holiday excitement have kept me away but I’m back to update you a little on my progress.

First, I’d like to re-admit the truth: this is a hard process. Anyone who says differently is lying to you. You have to find time to work around your other classes and commitments. You have to understand that you will most likely run into a half dozen dead-ends or gaping holes to be filled. You have to keep liking your topic after reading hundreds of pages about it over the course of months. A thesis is not just a big paper.

Luckily, there are people around for support. I have an incredible advisor. I have wonderful friends who haven’t quite yet told me that they no longer want to hear my complaining. There are talented other people who are doing the same thing and usually don’t mind venting for a while. There are amazing reference librarians at Swem. And there are the Charles Center resources.

In more exciting news, I recently took trip to Brandeis University to research with the Samuel Gridley Howe collection. After confirming that they had sources that I wanted to see, I used my research expenses to head up north. When I wasn’t reading old books in their special collections, I got to spend some time in Boston. Such a cool place for a history nerd! They are having a mild winter too so it wasn’t even too cold. The librarian was incredibly nice and helpful. I loved the experience of researching at another institution and I found some really useful quotes from the time itself.

It’s about a week before the final draft should be done and I am struggling to get all the information from my mind (and notes) into a coherent product that I’m happy with. But each day, a little something gets done and eventually the little somethings will become a bigger something. Once I have that, I can shape it into what I was imagining. This whole research process has taught me so much about myself. I’m nervous for the next few months of polishing it up but I’m excited to see a finished product from everything. I’ll keep you posted!

Jan
06

Happy New Year!

Fall semester went by so quickly- this seems to be the theme in my life, everything flying by before I even realize it. I had a great time though spending my last lovely fall at William and Mary and made great progress in my research as well. As of now I have received a good number of responses to my survey, which I have analyzed in brief. I will be collecting the remainder of my data through interviews this semester. The results so far compel me to keep going. There is a need for the work I am doing. I hope that in this new year I can continue in my journey to bring clarity to an issue close to my heart in this field, especially as I anxiously await responses from grad schools concerning my future prospects. I take the warm weather of this winter as a good sign.

2012 Will be a year of promise and progress. Graduation, Relocation. Independence, Elections, even the supposed end of the world, bring it on! I’m looking forward to it all

Dec
30

Giving Adia More Voice

What a crazy couple of months! Finals, interviews, applications, and now, home for Winter Break, I’ve been in recovery. Despite my crazy schedule of late, or perhaps because of it, I have actually been surprisingly productive towards the end of November and beginning of December. Since coming home I’ve managed to reconnect with my story even more than in the weeks before finals. I’m hoping to have a clean revision with necessary additions by the end of January.

I believe last time I updated I had finished my read-through and begun revisions. Since then I’ve received comments back on my full rough draft and have been concentrating mostly on the additional material my advisor and I both feel necessary to the novel’s cohesiveness. We both particularly wanted Sophie’s parents to have a stronger presence in the story (I realized this while rewriting and therefore they are more prominent in the later parts of the novel but almost totally absent from the middle).

This addition of Sophie’s family, Mr. and Mrs. Mason, took time for me to figure out. The trouble for me rested in finding a way to add them into the story without destabilizing its center. I rather like the intense focus on Adia and Sophie that compromises the middle of this novel, and I also really enjoy how unclear it is just how much Sophie does or doesn’t know to be real. This is partially the result of Sophie choosing only to report certain things within her story. Adding in Mr. and Mrs. Mason causes problems with Sophie’s reports and also makes it more difficult to maintain Adia as both a possible real person and possible imaginary friend. For instance, obviously neither of Sophie’s parents can physically see Adia at any time, but having them never see her opens another can of worms. Removing them from the narrative in effect removed the issues that they bring with them.

So I was left trying to sort through these issues when another problem that I had diagnosed with the text based on my advisor’s comments
emerged. For Professor Coibion this is clearly a story focused on Sophie and if reality is in question it is only Adia’s that we question. Yet I wanted Adia to have a stronger voice, one that at least partially made readers question Sophie’s story. I wanted to feel tugged in both directions, to see both girls as valid and therefore in some way invalidating each other’s existence. I had already decided I wanted more from Adia’s perspective and it occurred to me that Adia, the girl whose family situation is so very unstable, would be very interested in Sophie’s parents. To kill two birds with one stone, therefore, I handed over a great deal of Mr. and Mrs. Mason to Adia. She became the narrator reporting on Sophie’s home life, and this makes perfect sense from a character perspective. It also keeps the focus on Sophie and Adia.

Mr. and Mrs. Mason’s relationship to each other and by extension to Sophie has become more important to the novel through these additions. Sophie’s parents have a strong marriage, but they are also very volatile emotionally, fighting often and quickly moving on. A young Sophie doesn’t quite understand this perceived instability, and I think she struggles with it. She often blames herself for a lot of the friction between her parents. Indeed as she becomes less and less attuned to the “real” world around her, Mr. and Mrs. Mason do begin to argue over how best to deal with Sophie’s problems.  I’ve decided to privilege Mr. Mason as the principle caretaker, the stay-at-home dad, and this really changes the traditional dynamic of the family. This gives Sophie a closer relationship with her father to off-set Adia’s intense relationship with her mother. It also
creates an interesting role for Mrs. Mason. She is a business woman often traveling and more than a little uncomfortable with motherhood, though she still tries very hard to connect to Sophie and be supportive of her.

In addition to Adia’s new narration, I’ve also allowed both girls to tell each other stories about their lives prior to meeting and things that
happen to them away from each other. These sections, which I’ve kept to long paragraphs, serve to break up the narrative. They also fill in a lot about my two friends and how and why they are what they are. My advisor, very insightfully I feel, mentioned that she finds Adia much more direct in her narration than Sophie. That comment had me reexamining both their narratives. I’ve noticed that Sophie tends to avoid certain emotional issues. She also is much more likely than Adia to compare the real to the imaginary and/or use creative metaphors and similes. Adia, while not lacking in imagination or avoidance, is definitely more blunt in how she expresses herself.  I’ve never really thought about how either Adia or Sophie would communicate. My two girls do think very differently, and I like the fact that their narrations show these differences without me over-thinking the issue.

Off to write! Happy Holidays to all:-)

 

Dec
30

The Writing Continues

Not much to update, but I thought I’d at least post something.

The introduction and first chapter, save for a few edits, are finished. It’s a big relief. Twenty-nine pages so far. Hoping to start the second chapter this weekend (and hopefully have gone through a couple of drafts before classes start up again).

As the writing has continued, so too has the research. I’ve work my way through the related documents in three separate volumes of state papers, along with some other pamphlets and broadsides (one of which had a great woodcut of the Battle of Killiecrankie). I’ve found some really useful material in the past week or two, so I will continue to look through some sources as I write.